Sunday, February 21, 2010

The Corporate Defilement of Local Foods

   Bright lights cut the inky early morning darkness, engines growl and brakes sigh as trucks slow to pull onto exit ramps.  Trailers filled with meat, fish and fresh vegetables traverse narrow alleys across America.  They silently navigate the empty streets accompanied only by the occasional dump truck or police car. 

   When a truck reaches its destination, the backdoor of a dark restaurant or the desolate loading dock of a large hotel, they go largely unnoticed except for the occasional purchasing agent, leaning bleary eyed against a refrigerator door with a cup of coffee and worn clipboard.   In a well rehearsed exchange of pleasantries the driver and stocker unload pallets of ingredients onto the damp concrete, each box inspected and weighed before an obligatory departing handshake.

   As the trailer pulls away the sun barely peeks from behind a grey cinderblock wall, illuminating the collage of hastily stacked boxes;   a crate of white peaches from chile,  corrugated wax boxes adorned with chinese lettering filled with greens, a styrofoam cooler crawling with lobsters and long cylinders of  cyrovaced beef tenderloins.  The clock ticks as the stocking agent frantically races against the sun, loading the contents of each box into clear plastic tubs and into the refrigerator before they spoil.  He tosses aside damaged products for credit and meticulously rotates the new products behind the old inventory.

  A few hours later, when the chef arrives, nothing is left of the early morning scene.  The boxes and crates have been broken down, the floors are swept and all of the products have been stored.   The stocking agent is long gone, retreated to a basement office where he pours over stacks of invoices and sips his third cup of coffee.   

   An antiquated pickup, stained with rust and mud, squeezes between a valet line of European luxury sedans.  To the unexpected delight of hotel guests the chef makes a grand appearance, greeting the rancher by name and helping him unload a few pounds of spring lamb.  Later on a kid with dreadlocks and sandals wanders through the kitchen looking to sell a few pounds of local chanterelles he harvested in the mountains earlier that morning.  At first incredulous, the chef sifts through the box, and then hands over a few dollars.  

  Just before lunch the chef removes his soiled apron and puts on a freshly starched white jacket.  He stops by the accounting department for a couple of hundred dollars before heading to the Friday farmer’s market.  Casually perusing the crowded isles he stops to smell an heirloom tomato, nibbles an edge of arugula before giving an approving nod, and occasionally probes the piles of plums and nectarines for ripeness.  Attracted by his regal white jacket people stop to murmur, stare and ask questions; “What’s for dinner?”, “How do you cook this?”, “Where do you work?”.

   Even as the chef loads boxes of local produce into his car he is caught in an awkward paradox - a community advocate for something he believes in but cannot himself fully practice.  

    Every purchase the chef makes is carefully documented.  Should he lose track, and spend too much on local products the calls will begin.   They will begin politely, but could eventually become confrontational, resulting in the chef losing his bonus or even his job.  

    Ultimately the chef is allowed to purchase only 5% of his ingredients from local farms and ranches, the rest must be procured through “the program”.  A thousand miles away, forgotten in a filing cabinet in an expansive corporate office, there is a contract that looms like a storm cloud in the back of the chef’s mind.  Essentially it is an agreement between the company that employees the chef and a third party who is assigned to monitor product costs.   In order to achieve the greatest bargaining power this company represents hundreds or even thousands of hotels and restaurants, negotiating contracts with vendors who can provide them the most consistent products at the best prices.  In return for favorable pricing the vendor is guaranteed a high volume of business.  One single group controls over 3 billion in annual purchasing power, and can negotiate vendor contracts far more aggressively than any private restaurant or hotel could fathom.  For each major category: meat, fish, produce, dairy and dry goods, the chef is assigned a corresponding vendor.   As long as the chef is smart and keeps his mouth shut, he can get away with ordering few token products of his choice from neighboring farms or specialty vendors.   Hopefully this 5% window will provide him enough local ingredients to spatter over his menu and allow the marketing team a toe hole in their promotional pursuits.  In fact, you would be surprised how many restaurants play this deceptive game under the noses of food critics and consumers alike.  


  “Local Field Greens with Frost Hill Farm’s Cucumbers, Cilantro, Avocado and Citrus-Coriander Dressing”

 

  When we read this it sounds honest and sustainable.  It isn’t immediately clear whether just the cucumbers come from Frost Hill Farm or if maybe the cucumbers, cilantro and avocado all come from the farm.  Or maybe they each come from local farms and the restaurant simply didn’t have room to list them all on the menu.  We assume that local means from the town or county, but in some people’s minds it could come from a neighboring state - not to mention that we have no idea the size of the farm or growing method.  The restaurant will spend $3 on ingredients for each salad they sell, in truth only 10 cents, the price of the cucumbers, will go to local farming families and directly stimulate the community’s economy.   The rest will filter through layers of vendors and distributors before portions are returned to the hotel through tactfully negotiated rebate programs.  

  The same storm-cloud that looms in the mind of the chef also haunts his vendors, its fat corporate fingers ever tightening, squeezing every ounce of profit from a line of emaciated farms and distributors as they struggle to survive.   Some of those savings are kept by the product procurement company in the form of service fees, but the rest is returned to the corporation as immediate cost savings and rebates.  Ultimately a company could save 25% or more on raw ingredients.  For a large company this could easily represent millions of dollars in cost savings over just a couple of years. 

   Maybe this is just smart business, after all, does it really hurt for a company to save a few cents a pound on ground beef in today’s ever more challenging economic environment?  First of all, even just a few cents must be accounted for; where was it saved?  Was it saved on the size of the lot that was used to raise the cow?  Was it saved on the feed?  Was it saved by letting a few sick animals slip by inspection?  Was it saved by racing the animals through an automated slaughter facility?  Was is saved by the use of dubious cheap labor labor?  Was it saved through the use of hormones, antibiotics and chemicals?  Was it saved at the expense of ethics and morality?  In truth it is likely all of these things.

  These are questions we have to ask not just for ground beef, but for every product that ends up on our tables.   Where is it coming from?

   What about the small farms and ranches?  Simply put, from a corporate standpoint they don’t exist.  Their yields are too small to compute, too costly and inconsistent to even bother with.   Sure Bob’s tomatoes taste good, but will the customer really notice if we use 5x6 gassed tomatoes from Mexico instead?  Will they understand why our burger costs a dollar more than down the street?  The corporation will placate the chef’s ego with small concessions.  They will feature a few local products on the menu and in their advertising campaigns.  They will proclaim their desire to be sustainable and support the local community, but at the end of the day it is all about money. 


  Sadly there are currently no laws regulating the use of local ingredients.  There is no effort made to enforce truth in advertising or validate claims of local products on menus.    In short there is nothing to stop companies from exploiting the public through little more than slight of hand and vague claims- all the while making it near impossible for true farm to table restaurants to be successful.  

  With thousands of hotels and restaurants already using buying programs, and hundreds more joining each year, consumers can no longer take anything for granted.  Buying programs aren’t just found at cookie cutter chains, they dominate the entire hotel and restaurant world.  Even seemingly family operated hotels and restaurants, from the least expensive to the most acclaimed, often have a concealed corporate buying agenda.  

  As consumers we have the rights to know what you are paying for.  In a world where small farms are disappearing at an alarming rate, and food borne illness is rampant, we can no longer accept vague answers and questionable claims- we must demand to know where your food comes from today. 

The Factory Farm- Can you Handle the Truth?

  If you enjoy the occasional fast food hamburger, discount eggs, cream in your coffee or sliced cheese you need to watch this video.  Like I have said before - I am not a vegetarian - and I'm not an animal rights activist.   However, I do think every animal deserves respect and appreciation.  If you are going to eat something - you need to know where it comes from and how it was raised.  I don't think this video reflects all animal production facilities - but I also don't think it grossly exaggerates the conditions at some of them.   We all make choices every day.  Choices that impact our own well being- but also the well being of our communities and the creatures and plants that exist within them.   To ignore the inhumane conditions of meat production is to passively accept it and thereby pass your vote of acceptance.  
  While attending culinary school in Vermont my class was able to go to a country slaughterhouse.  The day we went the butchers were processing a dozen local sheep.  Each sheep was pushed down an enclosed trough and then abruptly blasted through the skull with a bolt-gun.  It was a gruesome sight which to this day has left me vivid memories.  The difference between watching those sheep die and watching the animals in this video is that the animals in Vermont actually led a normal and happy life up until the point when they were slaughtered.  They ran through the hills, ate wild grasses and flowers and socialized with the other sheep.   It was like a fairy tale compared with most of today's factory farms. 
  I have absolutely no ethical qualms with anyone who acknowledges where their food comes from and respects its source.   However, I cannot stand people who blindly accept their food supply with no regard for its origin.  Our ignorance as a society is the fuel for factory farming.  
  After watching this video I'm still not close to being a vegetarian- but I am more than happy to pay a premium for local meats produced by independent ranches.  

Saturday, February 20, 2010

OLD FISH


The Dirty - Rotten Truth Behind the Global Fish Trade

What is fresh, local fish worth to you? What costs more- a fish that is caught in the Philippines, frozen then shipped to Hawaii- or a fish that is caught in Hawaii then sold? Why are people sitting on the Lanai of some luxury hotel watching fishing boats on the horizon while eating an “onaga” snapper that was caught in Malaysia? Why does Hawaii export 40% of the fish it produces while importing 70% of the fish it consumes?

When I worked at a hotel we had a small budget to feed our employees. Normally we couldn’t afford fish- but sometimes, when they were on sale, we would buy boxes of frozen mahi mahi filets from the fish company for the employee cafeteria. They would come in thirty pound cases, frozen solid, labeled “product of the Philippines”. On the same day we would receive fresh mahi mahi from a local fisherman and pay four dollars per pound for the whole fish. When you adjust this price for the yield of an average fish, the price per pound jumps to eight dollars. Now, if someone in San Francisco wanted this same filet they might pay twelve dollars per pound. The price per pound of the mahi filet from the Philippines was under three dollars.

Many of the employees at the hotel ate the staff lunches with great enthusiasm; I was not one of them. When the box of mahi mahi was opened to defrost the filets wept a clear brine that smelled of formaldehyde, and no matter how hot the pan, the flesh refused to brown. We would often use strong Thai curries to cover the tainted smell of the fish. At the time I naively assumed this stench was the tell tale sign of a fish packed in a last ditch effort to preserve it for commercial sale, but the true source is far more disturbing.

The Filipinos make more money selling their fish to Hawaii than selling it locally, and the Hawaiians make more money selling their fish to the mainland than keeping it to sell locally. So the Hawaiians are eating Mahi that was caught in the Philippines so they can sell their catch to the mainland, while the Filipinos are eating fish that was imported from China because they can’t afford to keep fish caught locally.

Even off the coast of New York blue fin tuna are regularly exported to Japan because local markets cannot keep up with Tokyo prices. These Tuna are cryogenically frozen and cut with giant band-saws before being sold at high end sushi bars.

Is it just me, or does it seem like everyone is eating old fish? Filipinos are eating Frozen Chinese fish. Hawaiians are eating frozen Filipino fish. People on Mainland America are eating old Hawaiian fish and Japanese are eating old fish from everywhere. Hardly anyone is eating fresh fish because they would rather sell it to someone else!

And now we come to the more ominous portion of this story. Beyond the obvious issues of food quality and fuel cost, there are even more disturbing things to consider. In 2007 the FDA rejected over 200 shipments of farmed fish from China citing the use of illegal drugs, chemicals or other preservatives. Less developed nations are unable to detect contaminants that may pose a public safety risk. In 2005 over sixty percent of the restaurants in Indonesia were found to be serving fish contaminated with formaldehyde, a tissue preservative commonly used in embalming fluid. In 2007 Vietnam suffered a similar epidemic. Late last year the The Tambuyog Development Center, an organization focused on promoting sustainable fisheries in the Philippines, issued a statement saying that the government should not participate in the global food trade. Executive director Milo Tanchuling said, “How can the government allow liberalized trade policy when it cannot assure public safety?”

Over the last twenty years China has grown into a dominant force in the global fish market. Currently they produce 115 billion pounds of seafood, or roughly 70% of all globally farmed fish. This astounding figure is made possible by the roughly 4.5 million independent fish farms that operate in lakes, beaches and rivers around the country. With few environmental regulations, and almost no enforcement, these farms depend on heavily dousing the water with antibiotics and pesticides to enable the fish to live in water so contaminated it’s considered toxic.

Thankfully things here at home are different! We have a sophisticated network of government funded agencies that insure we are protected. On any given Sunday afternoon we can pick up a few snapper filets at the neighborhood grocery and know that they are wholesome. Or can we?

On my quest to understand the irony of the global seafood trade I stumbled across some interesting reports created by the United States Government Accountability Office outlining some of their concerns with imported seafood. I have provided a few of the most shocking portions below- but would encourage you to do your own research at HYPERLINK "http://www.gao.gov" www.gao.gov (search “seafood”)


“ The FDA has to rely on labor-intensive inspections of products at the port of

entry as its primary line of defense against the entry of unsafe foods. We

continue to believe that port-of-entry inspections alone do not effectively

ensure the safety of imported seafood.” 2001


“More than 80 percent of the seafood that Americans consume is imported. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for ensuring that imported seafood is safe and produced under sanitation and safety systems comparable to those of the United States. Since GAO reported in 2001 that FDA's seafood inspection program did not sufficiently protect consumers, additional concerns have arisen about imported seafood containing banned substances, such as certain antibiotics. GAO found that FDA continues to experience long delays between finding deficiencies and taking action. For example, GAO's review of foreign firm inspection records found that it took an average of 348 days for FDA to alert port-of entry personnel about serious safety problems identified at six foreign firms.” 2004


“In 2007, Americans consumed almost 5 billion pounds of seafood. Most seafood buyers, at many levels--importers, distributors, supermarkets, restaurants, and individual consumers--assume that the seafood they buy is what the seller claims it is. However, this is not always the case. Sometimes seafood products are mislabeled for financial gain--an activity called seafood fraud. The FDA examines only about 2 percent of imported seafood annually” 2009


In other words, the FDA has failed to fix problems that were identified over twelve years ago, problems that pose serious concerns to American consumers. Let’s not forget the incident in 2007 when over 6,000 pounds of highly toxic puffer fish entered the US labeled as Monk Fish. A portion of this product ended up at fish markets in Hawaii and several people in Chicago became ill after consuming the tainted flesh. Each puffer fish, called fugu in Japan, contains enough tetrodotoxin to kill 30 adults; not exactly the kind of fish you want your neighborhood chef getting ahold of.

All of this news is especially tragic for Hawaii, an island state that once sustained itself from the bounties of the sea,relying solely on family and friends to provide for the community. Now, with no tangible connection from source to table, Hawaii faces a grave culinary future and further loss of its cultural heritage and identity.


What is the fresh, local fish worth to you now?

Who am I anyway?


I'm a frustrated cook, chef and restaurant owner in a desperate quest to ensure that real food will still exist when I'm old enough to sit back and enjoy it.



An Introduction to Culinary Anarchy

Proceed with Caution!  If you enjoy cooking at home and going out to restaurants please be advised that reading this could inhibit your enjoyment of these activities.  

  The world's culinary future is at risk.   Look around at the hermetically sealed blocks of proteins that line the isles of every supermarket in America, chunks of meat that we can only presume once came from some living animal.   Stripped of their identity, their lives trivialized and largely forgotten, these ghostly creatures live in a world shrouded by the corporations who tirelessly pump them through automated production lines.  
  Our vegetables grow on vast tracts of earth void of character.  Endless rows of identical crops strip the earth of nutrients while giant machines try to play god by creating some artificially induced equilibrium.  These vegetables show up at markets in perfectly stacked boxes- conveniently engineered for ease of transport and storage;  Their insipid-unripe flesh little more than a reflection of what they were once intended to be.  
  The US government not only allows this bastardization of our culinary heritage- but actively encourages it.   The FDA has fallen apart and lost control over the safety of our food.  Giant corporations are eradicating heirloom crops along with family owned farms and restaurants in a way that can only be described as a culinary holocaust.  Without public intervention your kids will never know the taste of fresh tomato and your grandkids won't know that beef once came from a cow.  
  This is a blog that is intended to cut through the bullshit and expose the truth.  By now we have all heard of "localvore", "Organic", "Sustainable" and all the other catch phrases.  We have watched movies and read books that outline the problems we are facing - but we still don't have any idea how much trouble we are in.   This is not a problem that can be fixed through coffee table books and weekend social clubs- it is something that requires a deep rooted social rebellion.  
  
  
an·ar·chy

Pronunciation: \ˈa-nər-kē, -ˌnär-\
Function: noun
Etymology: Medieval Latin anarchia, from Greek, from anarchos having no ruler, from an- + archos ruler 
Date: 1539

1 a : absence of government b : a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority c : a utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without government
2 a : absence or denial of any authority or established order b : absence of order :