Monday, July 26, 2010
Lone Mountain Ranch Wagyu
I first visited Lone Mountain Ranch four years ago while working in Santa Fe, New Mexico. My sous chef and I were looking for locally produced Wagyu beef and came across a listing for Lone Mountain Ranch. Back then the herd was still being developed and the ranch's focus on was building and selling genetics.
Just this week- after fours years of patiently waiting- I received my first batch of 100% Wagyu Beef. The quality exceeded my highest expectations. As you would expect from a wagyu the marbling was exceptional. The flavor of the beef, possibly due spending more time on pasture than most commercially produced animals, was more developed and complex without being overpowering.
To start I ordered thirty pounds of grade 9 tri-tip, one of my favorite cuts. Unlike a filet or new york that can be thrown into a pan and then onto a plate, the tri tip requires a slow cooking process and proper slicing to coax out the flavor and tenderness potential.
We couldn't wait to give the steaks the royal treatment they deserved. As soon as the box reached the kitchen I cut off an end piece, salt and peppered it, and put it on the grill. The flavor was exceptional but due to being cooked too quickly and not rested the meat was tough. Based on this initial experiment it was decided that it would be best to cure the meat overnight and then slowly smoke it.
One of my sous chefs, Brian Kearns, adopted the steaks and took them through the cooking process. The photos of the cooked meat are compliments of him.
The cure was a simple mix of brown sugar, sicilian sea salt, green coriander seeds, orange zest, guajillo chile and bay leaves. We packed the steaks in the cure overnight then brushed the cure off and let them air dry in front of a fan so that the smoke would be able to permeate the meat. At this point our classic European kitchen was ill prepared for the project at hand and we had to transport the steaks to Brian's backyard barbecue where they were slow smoked over hickory wood for three hours at two hundred degrees.
Its not every day that you can get a barbecued wagyu tri tip sandwich with early girl tomato barbecue sauce at a classic Italian restaurant in Carmel- in fact I think it is a first in the restaurant's illustrious 35 year history. Our customers loved the sandwich and I was happy to share a product with them from my home in New Mexico.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Devil's Gulch Pig and Local Air Chilled Duck
Imagine a golden pile of crispy chicken McNuggets - innocuously cradled inside their colorful cardboard packaging. For many Americans that is the definition of good wholesome food. It's like the Disney Movie of the dining world - free of sex and violence - clean wholesome fun for the entire family.
Now take a look at the picture........ What kind of sick individual would contrive such a thing?
In actuality - when you get past the media fueled hype of what good food is- you begin to realize that this picture represents a far more humane and sustainable dining culture.
Devil's Gulch Pig- The skull in this picture started out as a sixty pound pig. It spent its days wandering freely between grapevines and orchards along the Sonoma coast. When it's time came it was taken to a small local butcher where it was killed, cleaned and shipped.
The first day we removed the pig's head and made a roulade- or Porchetta out of the entire body. We seasoned the meat with dried fruits and fresh herbs before slowly roasting it in the oven until the skin became crisp and translucent.
We took the trotters and bones from the pig and used them to enhance our stock- gradually extracting the gelatin to give our demiglace a velvety smooth consistency.
Finally we boiled the head with spices and made a terrine from the brain, ears and cheek meat. While our customer's aren't fond of this preparation- our kitchen staff enjoyed it with grilled garlic bread and grain mustard.
By the end of the week all that was left was the pig's skull - picked clean- just like nature intended.
Duck- Take a good look at the duck head in the picture. You will notice how the eye appears to look at you and the yellow around the beak is still vibrant. It looks like the duck could almost be alive. If you get beyond the sentiment and emotions it is easy to understand that while it may be uncomfortable to look at a whole duck like this- you can at least tell that it led a decent life. Sure a package of ambiguous duck breasts might be easier for the average cook to stomach- but merely being presented out of context doesn't change the reality of where they came from. At least when you get the whole animal you can determine to some extent the way it was treated. When I look at this duck I would like to believe that it had a happy and humane life before it made its way into my kitchen.
There is nothing quite like cooking a whole animal. I don't mean a chicken that you get at your local grocery, I'm talking about an animal that looks back at you when you open the box. When you come face to face with an animal you can't help but acknowledge the sacrifice that goes into the food we eat. Every item that we consume, whether it be a soy bean hidden within some processed food or a duck breast at a fine dining restaurant, has a history. Simply failing to acknowledge that history or its implications do not make us exempt from the consequences that result from our dining habits.
Monday, May 3, 2010
Let’s Raise a Chicken
I recently received a promotion from one of my suppliers advertising eight way cut cases of chicken for thirty nine cents per pound. As I stared at the flyer I couldn’t help but wonder how it is possible to purchase a chicken for so little.
Let’s figure that you and I want to start a small chicken production. We learn that an average chicken takes 4 months to reach maturity and eats an average of .25# of food per day. This means that a chicken will have consumed roughly 30# of feed by the time it is butchered. It seems reasonable that a chicken would require at least thirty seconds per day of time to feed and attend to. Multiply thirty seconds by 120 days and the chicken has cost 1 hour of labor by the time it is ready to be butchered. Now we have to feather, bleed and gut the bird before cutting it into 8 portions. For an adept butcher this process would take 15 minutes of hard work. Figure that we pay someone ten dollars per hour to care for and feed the bird and now our labor cost is $12.50
Let’s factor the feed at ten cents per pound and add $3 to the total price. This brings the cost of the chicken to $15.50. This is assuming the chicken is raised and butchered in the same place. We know this is not often the case- so let’s add .25/# for packaging, shipping and refrigeration. Now our four pound chicken has cost $16.50 to produce. We have not even touched on materials, utility costs, medicine, supplements etc.
How is it possible that I can buy a four pound chicken for $1.56? Think about that next time you are browsing the butcher case.
Friday, April 30, 2010
A Letter for Hana
Last week I received some sad but somewhat expected news about one of my all time favorite hotels. The Hotel Hana Maui is in the process of being purchased by an investment group out of Denver. In some ways I know it is for the best- the Hotel has been struggling financially for several years and is in much need of repair. I just hope that the new owners will continue to keep the community as a top priority- in a town where the hotel provides over 90% of the jobs, and directly impacts the remaining 10%, it is easy to understand how corporate policies can quickly impact the entire region.
Change is always hard- but I hope this one turns out to be in the best interest of the community. I couldn't resist writing my own letter to the new owners.
Dear Amstar-
I wanted to write and congratulate you on your pending purchase of Hotel Hana Maui. Over the last ten years I have worked as executive chef and corporate chef for some of the most acclaimed resorts in the country; but Hana is a very special place for me. In addition to being a chef- I am also the culinary editor and photographer for Edible Hawaii, a well recognized publication within Hawaii and the hospitality community. I realize that operations, particularly F&B, are not your primary focus, but hope you will read my letter none the less.
Hotel Hana Maui was my first executive chef position at the age of twenty two after spending three years as chef de cuisine at the Post Ranch Inn. At that time I had no real interest in Hawaii and saw the hotel as little more than a stepping stone on my way to a more illustrious future. I cringed at the boxes of rotten fish and produce that were imported from the mainland. Slowly I began to build relationships with small farms and local fisherman and the hotel became less dependent on imported products. In the process of sourcing fresh vegetables I helped educate local growers on how to maximize their acreage by growing less common, yet more desirable, products. ( I’m sure that somewhere in Kula there is still a rogue artichoke field waiting to be picked. )
I ended up leaving Passport Resorts and Hotel Hana Maui three years later- taking the corporate executive chef position for Noble House Hotels. Three years ago life called me back to Hana. It was during this time that I realized how much I overlooked on my first encounter; things like the historical significance of Leho’ula (the first fish pond in Hawaii), the vibrant Paniolo culture in Kipahulu and Kaupo and most importantly the strong cultural differences between Hana and the rest of Maui.
Some people have asked me why I went back to Hana. Why leave a lucrative executive job to go back to a little hotel in the middle of nowhere? For me the answer is simple- it was to experience the place and culture while I still could. I have documented many of my thoughts and observations in various articles, a few of which can be found at www.ediblehawaii.com
I sincerely hope, for the sake of the community, that your well established investment team will be able to find the financial formula that has eluded so many previous companies. As you ponder how to best move forward I hope that you will take into consideration the fisherman and farmers who have come to rely on the hotel as a primary source of income. These individuals are important stewards of East Maui’s natural resources and help Hana maintain its rustic agrarian charm. While it is easy to calculate the yield of a locally caught fish and plug it into a recipe costing formula- it is far more difficult to ascertain how watching that fish being unloaded from a still wet fishing boat in front of the hotel impacts a guest’s overall vacation experience.
Your company may not be making all of these decisions directly- but the choices you make over the next few months will have a profound impact on the community. I have several friends in Hana- and would still very much like to contribute to the community in any way that I can. On that note please feel free to contact me if you come across any questions I might help answer.
All The Best-
Sunday, February 21, 2010
The Corporate Defilement of Local Foods
Bright lights cut the inky early morning darkness, engines growl and brakes sigh as trucks slow to pull onto exit ramps. Trailers filled with meat, fish and fresh vegetables traverse narrow alleys across America. They silently navigate the empty streets accompanied only by the occasional dump truck or police car.
When a truck reaches its destination, the backdoor of a dark restaurant or the desolate loading dock of a large hotel, they go largely unnoticed except for the occasional purchasing agent, leaning bleary eyed against a refrigerator door with a cup of coffee and worn clipboard. In a well rehearsed exchange of pleasantries the driver and stocker unload pallets of ingredients onto the damp concrete, each box inspected and weighed before an obligatory departing handshake.
As the trailer pulls away the sun barely peeks from behind a grey cinderblock wall, illuminating the collage of hastily stacked boxes; a crate of white peaches from chile, corrugated wax boxes adorned with chinese lettering filled with greens, a styrofoam cooler crawling with lobsters and long cylinders of cyrovaced beef tenderloins. The clock ticks as the stocking agent frantically races against the sun, loading the contents of each box into clear plastic tubs and into the refrigerator before they spoil. He tosses aside damaged products for credit and meticulously rotates the new products behind the old inventory.
A few hours later, when the chef arrives, nothing is left of the early morning scene. The boxes and crates have been broken down, the floors are swept and all of the products have been stored. The stocking agent is long gone, retreated to a basement office where he pours over stacks of invoices and sips his third cup of coffee.
An antiquated pickup, stained with rust and mud, squeezes between a valet line of European luxury sedans. To the unexpected delight of hotel guests the chef makes a grand appearance, greeting the rancher by name and helping him unload a few pounds of spring lamb. Later on a kid with dreadlocks and sandals wanders through the kitchen looking to sell a few pounds of local chanterelles he harvested in the mountains earlier that morning. At first incredulous, the chef sifts through the box, and then hands over a few dollars.
Just before lunch the chef removes his soiled apron and puts on a freshly starched white jacket. He stops by the accounting department for a couple of hundred dollars before heading to the Friday farmer’s market. Casually perusing the crowded isles he stops to smell an heirloom tomato, nibbles an edge of arugula before giving an approving nod, and occasionally probes the piles of plums and nectarines for ripeness. Attracted by his regal white jacket people stop to murmur, stare and ask questions; “What’s for dinner?”, “How do you cook this?”, “Where do you work?”.
Even as the chef loads boxes of local produce into his car he is caught in an awkward paradox - a community advocate for something he believes in but cannot himself fully practice.
Every purchase the chef makes is carefully documented. Should he lose track, and spend too much on local products the calls will begin. They will begin politely, but could eventually become confrontational, resulting in the chef losing his bonus or even his job.
Ultimately the chef is allowed to purchase only 5% of his ingredients from local farms and ranches, the rest must be procured through “the program”. A thousand miles away, forgotten in a filing cabinet in an expansive corporate office, there is a contract that looms like a storm cloud in the back of the chef’s mind. Essentially it is an agreement between the company that employees the chef and a third party who is assigned to monitor product costs. In order to achieve the greatest bargaining power this company represents hundreds or even thousands of hotels and restaurants, negotiating contracts with vendors who can provide them the most consistent products at the best prices. In return for favorable pricing the vendor is guaranteed a high volume of business. One single group controls over 3 billion in annual purchasing power, and can negotiate vendor contracts far more aggressively than any private restaurant or hotel could fathom. For each major category: meat, fish, produce, dairy and dry goods, the chef is assigned a corresponding vendor. As long as the chef is smart and keeps his mouth shut, he can get away with ordering few token products of his choice from neighboring farms or specialty vendors. Hopefully this 5% window will provide him enough local ingredients to spatter over his menu and allow the marketing team a toe hole in their promotional pursuits. In fact, you would be surprised how many restaurants play this deceptive game under the noses of food critics and consumers alike.
“Local Field Greens with Frost Hill Farm’s Cucumbers, Cilantro, Avocado and Citrus-Coriander Dressing”
When we read this it sounds honest and sustainable. It isn’t immediately clear whether just the cucumbers come from Frost Hill Farm or if maybe the cucumbers, cilantro and avocado all come from the farm. Or maybe they each come from local farms and the restaurant simply didn’t have room to list them all on the menu. We assume that local means from the town or county, but in some people’s minds it could come from a neighboring state - not to mention that we have no idea the size of the farm or growing method. The restaurant will spend $3 on ingredients for each salad they sell, in truth only 10 cents, the price of the cucumbers, will go to local farming families and directly stimulate the community’s economy. The rest will filter through layers of vendors and distributors before portions are returned to the hotel through tactfully negotiated rebate programs.
The same storm-cloud that looms in the mind of the chef also haunts his vendors, its fat corporate fingers ever tightening, squeezing every ounce of profit from a line of emaciated farms and distributors as they struggle to survive. Some of those savings are kept by the product procurement company in the form of service fees, but the rest is returned to the corporation as immediate cost savings and rebates. Ultimately a company could save 25% or more on raw ingredients. For a large company this could easily represent millions of dollars in cost savings over just a couple of years.
Maybe this is just smart business, after all, does it really hurt for a company to save a few cents a pound on ground beef in today’s ever more challenging economic environment? First of all, even just a few cents must be accounted for; where was it saved? Was it saved on the size of the lot that was used to raise the cow? Was it saved on the feed? Was it saved by letting a few sick animals slip by inspection? Was it saved by racing the animals through an automated slaughter facility? Was is saved by the use of dubious cheap labor labor? Was it saved through the use of hormones, antibiotics and chemicals? Was it saved at the expense of ethics and morality? In truth it is likely all of these things.
These are questions we have to ask not just for ground beef, but for every product that ends up on our tables. Where is it coming from?
What about the small farms and ranches? Simply put, from a corporate standpoint they don’t exist. Their yields are too small to compute, too costly and inconsistent to even bother with. Sure Bob’s tomatoes taste good, but will the customer really notice if we use 5x6 gassed tomatoes from Mexico instead? Will they understand why our burger costs a dollar more than down the street? The corporation will placate the chef’s ego with small concessions. They will feature a few local products on the menu and in their advertising campaigns. They will proclaim their desire to be sustainable and support the local community, but at the end of the day it is all about money.
Sadly there are currently no laws regulating the use of local ingredients. There is no effort made to enforce truth in advertising or validate claims of local products on menus. In short there is nothing to stop companies from exploiting the public through little more than slight of hand and vague claims- all the while making it near impossible for true farm to table restaurants to be successful.
With thousands of hotels and restaurants already using buying programs, and hundreds more joining each year, consumers can no longer take anything for granted. Buying programs aren’t just found at cookie cutter chains, they dominate the entire hotel and restaurant world. Even seemingly family operated hotels and restaurants, from the least expensive to the most acclaimed, often have a concealed corporate buying agenda.
As consumers we have the rights to know what you are paying for. In a world where small farms are disappearing at an alarming rate, and food borne illness is rampant, we can no longer accept vague answers and questionable claims- we must demand to know where your food comes from today.
The Factory Farm- Can you Handle the Truth?
Saturday, February 20, 2010
OLD FISH
What is fresh, local fish worth to you? What costs more- a fish that is caught in the Philippines, frozen then shipped to Hawaii- or a fish that is caught in Hawaii then sold? Why are people sitting on the Lanai of some luxury hotel watching fishing boats on the horizon while eating an “onaga” snapper that was caught in Malaysia? Why does Hawaii export 40% of the fish it produces while importing 70% of the fish it consumes?
When I worked at a hotel we had a small budget to feed our employees. Normally we couldn’t afford fish- but sometimes, when they were on sale, we would buy boxes of frozen mahi mahi filets from the fish company for the employee cafeteria. They would come in thirty pound cases, frozen solid, labeled “product of the Philippines”. On the same day we would receive fresh mahi mahi from a local fisherman and pay four dollars per pound for the whole fish. When you adjust this price for the yield of an average fish, the price per pound jumps to eight dollars. Now, if someone in San Francisco wanted this same filet they might pay twelve dollars per pound. The price per pound of the mahi filet from the Philippines was under three dollars.
Many of the employees at the hotel ate the staff lunches with great enthusiasm; I was not one of them. When the box of mahi mahi was opened to defrost the filets wept a clear brine that smelled of formaldehyde, and no matter how hot the pan, the flesh refused to brown. We would often use strong Thai curries to cover the tainted smell of the fish. At the time I naively assumed this stench was the tell tale sign of a fish packed in a last ditch effort to preserve it for commercial sale, but the true source is far more disturbing.
The Filipinos make more money selling their fish to Hawaii than selling it locally, and the Hawaiians make more money selling their fish to the mainland than keeping it to sell locally. So the Hawaiians are eating Mahi that was caught in the Philippines so they can sell their catch to the mainland, while the Filipinos are eating fish that was imported from China because they can’t afford to keep fish caught locally.
Even off the coast of New York blue fin tuna are regularly exported to Japan because local markets cannot keep up with Tokyo prices. These Tuna are cryogenically frozen and cut with giant band-saws before being sold at high end sushi bars.
Is it just me, or does it seem like everyone is eating old fish? Filipinos are eating Frozen Chinese fish. Hawaiians are eating frozen Filipino fish. People on Mainland America are eating old Hawaiian fish and Japanese are eating old fish from everywhere. Hardly anyone is eating fresh fish because they would rather sell it to someone else!
And now we come to the more ominous portion of this story. Beyond the obvious issues of food quality and fuel cost, there are even more disturbing things to consider. In 2007 the FDA rejected over 200 shipments of farmed fish from China citing the use of illegal drugs, chemicals or other preservatives. Less developed nations are unable to detect contaminants that may pose a public safety risk. In 2005 over sixty percent of the restaurants in Indonesia were found to be serving fish contaminated with formaldehyde, a tissue preservative commonly used in embalming fluid. In 2007 Vietnam suffered a similar epidemic. Late last year the The Tambuyog Development Center, an organization focused on promoting sustainable fisheries in the Philippines, issued a statement saying that the government should not participate in the global food trade. Executive director Milo Tanchuling said, “How can the government allow liberalized trade policy when it cannot assure public safety?”
Over the last twenty years China has grown into a dominant force in the global fish market. Currently they produce 115 billion pounds of seafood, or roughly 70% of all globally farmed fish. This astounding figure is made possible by the roughly 4.5 million independent fish farms that operate in lakes, beaches and rivers around the country. With few environmental regulations, and almost no enforcement, these farms depend on heavily dousing the water with antibiotics and pesticides to enable the fish to live in water so contaminated it’s considered toxic.
Thankfully things here at home are different! We have a sophisticated network of government funded agencies that insure we are protected. On any given Sunday afternoon we can pick up a few snapper filets at the neighborhood grocery and know that they are wholesome. Or can we?
On my quest to understand the irony of the global seafood trade I stumbled across some interesting reports created by the United States Government Accountability Office outlining some of their concerns with imported seafood. I have provided a few of the most shocking portions below- but would encourage you to do your own research at HYPERLINK "http://www.gao.gov" www.gao.gov (search “seafood”)
“ The FDA has to rely on labor-intensive inspections of products at the port of
entry as its primary line of defense against the entry of unsafe foods. We
continue to believe that port-of-entry inspections alone do not effectively
ensure the safety of imported seafood.” 2001
“More than 80 percent of the seafood that Americans consume is imported. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for ensuring that imported seafood is safe and produced under sanitation and safety systems comparable to those of the United States. Since GAO reported in 2001 that FDA's seafood inspection program did not sufficiently protect consumers, additional concerns have arisen about imported seafood containing banned substances, such as certain antibiotics. GAO found that FDA continues to experience long delays between finding deficiencies and taking action. For example, GAO's review of foreign firm inspection records found that it took an average of 348 days for FDA to alert port-of entry personnel about serious safety problems identified at six foreign firms.” 2004
“In 2007, Americans consumed almost 5 billion pounds of seafood. Most seafood buyers, at many levels--importers, distributors, supermarkets, restaurants, and individual consumers--assume that the seafood they buy is what the seller claims it is. However, this is not always the case. Sometimes seafood products are mislabeled for financial gain--an activity called seafood fraud. The FDA examines only about 2 percent of imported seafood annually” 2009
In other words, the FDA has failed to fix problems that were identified over twelve years ago, problems that pose serious concerns to American consumers. Let’s not forget the incident in 2007 when over 6,000 pounds of highly toxic puffer fish entered the US labeled as Monk Fish. A portion of this product ended up at fish markets in Hawaii and several people in Chicago became ill after consuming the tainted flesh. Each puffer fish, called fugu in Japan, contains enough tetrodotoxin to kill 30 adults; not exactly the kind of fish you want your neighborhood chef getting ahold of.
All of this news is especially tragic for Hawaii, an island state that once sustained itself from the bounties of the sea,relying solely on family and friends to provide for the community. Now, with no tangible connection from source to table, Hawaii faces a grave culinary future and further loss of its cultural heritage and identity.
What is the fresh, local fish worth to you now?